In the first three chapters of Genesis we have two very
simple but apparently divergent explanations of the creation process followed
by an explanation of our sinful nature. Christians often suffer from
ridicule for clinging to one or the other or parts of these narratives as
literal historical truth, but I believe that is unnecessary and
counterproductive. A careful reading, it seems to me, leads to an
understanding that these God-inspired stories are theological but neither scientific nor historical.
I've never, in my adult life, seen any real conflict between
the theological truths taught in the Genesis stories and the things we have learned
from scientific investigation of our origins, but my understanding was improved
a bit during a 2003 Old Testament Theology course at Lutheran Theological
Southern Seminary. Below is a chart I created at the time, slightly revised and reformatted to better fit the blog. If you are interested in the subject,
read the stories and see if you think my outlines and summaries of the stories and listings of
theological truths contained therein are accurate. I welcome any feedback. I am glad
to present Genesis 1-3 as truth, but make no claims about my feeble attempts at
understanding. You will need to click on the chart for an easier reading.
Tweet Follow @dkw2020
No comments:
Post a Comment