Maybe it is the journey beginning in the Southern Baptist
Church of my youth and early adulthood, progressing through middle
age commitments to a couple of “mainline” churches, and recently
moving to the Catholic Church, hopefully for my remaining senior years, that
caused me to enjoy so much Ross Douthat’s Bad
Religion: How We Became a Nation of Heretics. Or maybe it is just that I lived through and have
some familiarity with almost everything he discusses in the book but have never
knit all the pieces together in a continuous narrative, explaining the
development of theological liberalism as he does.
Douthat is a magna cum laud Harvard graduate, a Pentecostal
turned Catholic, and a lonely conservative columnist, the youngest ever, at the
New York Times. Don’t worry about him
though, because, when it comes to the written word, he can hold his own with anybody.
In Bad Religion, he has provided a well documented history of the US Christian
Church from the 1940’s to today, producing a volume that should qualify as a textbook for a course in any Christian seminary and deserves a permanent place in the library of any person of faith.
His story begins in the post WWII glory days for the
Christian Church in America, attendance, membership, and giving all increasing,
Protestant evangelist Billy Graham, Catholic Bishop Fulton Sheen, and Reverend
Martin Luther King, Jr., all receiving general respect and approval of the
public and little criticism, except from segregationists, and none of them
waffling on the traditional orthodox Apostles and Nicene Creed truths held by
Christians since the early centuries of the Church. It was a time when thirty seven mainline
denominations could cooperate to establish a protestant presence in New York
City, the National Council of Churches, have the cornerstone for their new
nineteen story skyscraper laid by President Eisenhower, and get favorable
comment and support from both the President of the United States and The New York Times.
But then the 1960’s brought the Vietnam War, the Pill and subsequent
sexual revolution, increasing wealth, mobility, consumerism and suburban
sprawl, globalization, theological relativism, and individualism. And political polarization began to divide
Christians and even complicate joint worship and prayer by “liberals” and “conservatives.” Inclusion and accommodation became the bywords
for mainline Protestant churches, and many formerly faithful members lost track
of the reasons they had joined and worshiped there. On the Catholic side, The American Catholic
Church influence waned as Vatican II was miss-interpreted, liturgical practices
suffered, and seminary discipline broke down.
And many formerly faithful Catholics and Protestants stayed home Sunday mornings and zipped up their pocketbooks.
And from that turmoil, according to Douthat, came Bad
Religion, abandonment of the orthodox fundamentals of the Christian faith and
adoption of heresies focusing on prosperity (Joel Osteen e.g.), narcissism and self
actualization (Eat, Pray, Love e.g.), and nationalism (Glen Beck e.g.).
You may be wondering how I can, with all that bad news about
the Church, claim, as I did in the first paragraph, to have enjoyed Douthat’s
book. I take comfort, first of all, in the promise Jesus made that he would establish
his Church and that the gates of Hell would not prevail against it so I am not
too stressed about the current state of affairs. I see the Church not as a civic or social or
political or self-help or even a social justice organization but a “place” of divine
mystery and miracles, the embassy of Heaven on Earth, a place to be comforted
and fed but also a place to be reminded that Jesus said that if we love him, we
are to keep his commandments.
Douthat makes it clear at the end of his book that his
objective was to make a “…case for Christian orthodoxy - defending its exacting
moralism as a curb against worldly excess and corruption, praising its
paradoxes and mysteries for respecting the complexities of human affairs in
ways that more streamlined theologies do not, celebrating the role of its
institutions in assimilating immigrants, sustaining families, and forging strong
communities.” He closes by inviting his readers to Church. I thought that was a positive note and one I
can endorse and second.
Tweet
Follow @dkw2020Other interesting articles on Douthat's book.
Interview with him.
A critical response to Douthat's book.
A Douthat defense of the book.
Discussion and critiques of Douthat's book.
An expert commentary by Fr. Robert Barron
It is obviously a book that has stirred up considerable interest and commentary. Get it and read it.
No comments:
Post a Comment